The Prince Essay -- essays research papers

All the states, all the dominions, under whose authority men have lived in the past and live now have been and atomic number 18 either republics or principalities. In Machiavellis, The Prince, timeless keys to a successful principality ar examined. The keys are soulhuman nature, respecting that nature, and reaffirming that successful leadershiphiphip can make upin the same fashion yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Machiavellis perspective of human nature is founded on the principle that peoplein general dont necessity their culture changed by an outside influence. Machiavellidemonstrates in the book that the nature of people is to defend who they are. When theprince attempts to change their culture in any way the subjects will do any number ofthings to crush this attempt or even change the leadership. If a prince exercisings force to try tochange people this will lead to hostility, beca aim as Machiavellis says, they remain,defeated, in their own homes. This underlying fact will lead to a rebellion of some sort. One way this rebellion can happen is when a powerful foreigner invades the principality. The now defeated people will join this powerful foreigner, in hopes that their culturewill now be respected, to dethrone the prince. When the prince tries to use force tocontrol the people it only creates enemies. Machiavelli explains this aspect of humannature when he writes, he harms the whole state by billeting his army in divers(prenominal) parts ofthe country, everyone suffers from this annoyance, and everybody is turned into anenemy. On the contrast if a prince allows the people to keep their customs Machiavellistates that the people will remain content when he writes, For the rest, so pine as theirold ways of life are undisturbed and there is no divergence in customs, men live quietly. Another natural movement of people comes with freedom. Once they have had a taste offreedom, they virtually cannot live without it. This feeling of control over ones l ife is a character that once molded is nearly impossible to reshape. Machiavelli asserts this ideawhen he writes, a city used to freedom can be more easily command through its owncitizens...than in any other way. The same tendency lies in the control that the princegains over the people in the principality. Once the prince has control he finds that gi... ...ook Mao usedpositive reenforcement to oil the gears of one of the worlds strongest super powers. Maodidnt try to use force and change the culture in China rather he persuaded the people intohaving great national pride. This pride enabled Mao to control the people also build astrong army and defend his land. In China Mao did and still today, decades after hisdeath, have a hand in every aspect of Chinese life. Both of these leaders project howtimeless Machiavellis ideas truly are.The first rung of the ladder to a successful principality is the intelligence ofhuman nature. A nature that value consistency over forced change and a n atmosphere ofcontrol over ones self instead of someone blatently controlling another. Through thisunderstanding of human nature can a prince hold his power. Once he holds this power thebest way to keep it is by providing defense for the people whom he has power over. These ideas were present in the infamous reigns of Hitler and Mao. Machiavelli is correctthere are either principalities or republics, and I have come to the conclusion I favour thelatter. The Prince Essay -- essays research papers All the states, all the dominions, under whose authority men have lived in the past and live now have been and are either republics or principalities. In Machiavellis, The Prince, timeless keys to a successful principality are examined. The keys are understandinghuman nature, respecting that nature, and reaffirming that successful leadership can make itin the same fashion yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Machiavellis perspective of human nature is founded on the principle that peoplein general dont indispensability their culture changed by an outside influence. Machiavellidemonstrates in the book that the nature of people is to defend who they are. When theprince attempts to change their culture in any way the subjects will do any number ofthings to crush this attempt or even change the leadership. If a prince uses force to try tochange people this will lead to hostility, because as Machiavellis says, they remain,defeated, in their own homes. This underlying fact will lead to a rebellion of some sort. One way this rebellion can happen is when a powerful foreigner invades the principality. The now defeated people will join this powerful foreigner, in hopes that their culturewill now be respected, to dethrone the prince. When the prince tries to use force tocontrol the people it only creates enemies. Machiavelli explains this aspect of humannature when he writes, he harms the whole state by billeting his army in unlike parts ofthe country, everyone su ffers from this annoyance, and everybody is turned into anenemy. On the contrast if a prince allows the people to keep their customs Machiavellistates that the people will remain content when he writes, For the rest, so huge as theirold ways of life are undisturbed and there is no divergence in customs, men live quietly. Another natural tendency of people comes with freedom. Once they have had a taste offreedom, they virtually cannot live without it. This feeling of control over ones life is a flavor that once molded is nearly impossible to reshape. Machiavelli asserts this ideawhen he writes, a city used to freedom can be more easily command through its owncitizens...than in any other way. The same tendency lies in the control that the princegains over the people in the principality. Once the prince has control he finds that gi... ...ook Mao usedpositive reenforcement to oil the gears of one of the worlds strongest super powers. Maodidnt try to use force and change the culture i n China rather he persuaded the people intohaving great national pride. This pride enabled Mao to control the people also build astrong soldiery and defend his land. In China Mao did and still today, decades after hisdeath, have a hand in every aspect of Chinese life. Both of these leaders project howtimeless Machiavellis ideas truly are.The first rung of the ladder to a successful principality is the understanding ofhuman nature. A nature that determine consistency over forced change and an atmosphere ofcontrol over ones self instead of someone blatently controlling another. Through thisunderstanding of human nature can a prince hold his power. Once he holds this power thebest way to keep it is by providing defense for the people whom he has power over. These ideas were present in the infamous reigns of Hitler and Mao. Machiavelli is correctthere are either principalities or republics, and I have come to the conclusion I prefer thelatter.